By this point, Marvel's superhero movie empire seems to be pretty much bulletproof. Starting with "Iron Man" back in 2008, Marvel has managed to take B-list superheroes and turn them into blockbusters, building enough buzz for their team-up film "The Avengers" that it became the highest-grossing superhero movie of all time. It would have been easy for Marvel to settle into that comfortable pattern of hits, which is why I admire them for taking a genuine risk this summer: "Guardians of the Galaxy."
"Guardians of the Galaxy" — based on one of Marvel's lesser-known comics — is a departure from the superhero films Marvel has produced in the past. The sci-fi action/adventure film involves a team of misfit rogues and criminals — a sort of anti-hero version of the Avengers — who team up (somewhat reluctantly) to save the galaxy. It's decidedly quirky; the trailers so far indicate the film will be heavy on comedy, and two of the members of that team of misfits include a talking raccoon and a walking tree (yes, you read that right).
It's understandable that at first some didn't think this was exactly the perfect recipe for a summer blockbuster. Would the concept be too strange, too obscure for audiences to connect with? Was it too much of a departure from the films audiences were used to seeing from Marvel? Would "Guardians" turn out to be Marvel's first real flop?
I'm hoping audiences will give this movie a chance. Of course I haven't seen it yet, so I could change my mind after this weekend, but initial buzz is very good, and I think the marketing campaign is working. The movie has a 97 percent rating right now on Rotten Tomatoes; while that number could drop some by this weekend, it's a great start, and the early reviews seem to be enthusiastic.
I've been really pleased with the trailers released for the movie so far. The visual effects look impressive (it seems likes it's been a while since we've seen a film with a really good all-out space battle), and the cast seems to be having fun with their roles. I think Chris Pratt will be great as the leader of the Guardians: Peter Quill, a sort of slacker Han Solo. However, Bradley Cooper may well steal the show as the voice of the feisty, gun-toting Rocket Raccoon.
I think Disney and Marvel also picked a good time to release the movie. Overall, this seems to be a slower summer than normal, and "Guardians" won't have much competition by the time it hits the box office this weekend. "Guardians" looks like the perfect blend of fun (and funny) and exciting, and the uniqueness of its concept could bring people out to the theater again.
Right now "Guardians" is tracking about $70 million, which isn't quite as high as "Captain America's" $90 million+ opening earlier this year but is still well above "flop" territory. If buzz continues to build and critical response remains strong, I could see this number actually going higher. Ironically, Marvel's bigger gamble now may actually be next summer's more conventional superhero movie "Ant-Man," which has been plagued by some negative buzz due to director and cast departures.
So, are you looking forward to "Guardians of the Galaxy?" Do you think it will be a hit or a miss for Marvel?